Lyotard develops the notion of paganism in “Lessons in Paganism” (reprinted in The Lyotard Reader), Just Gaming and various other short works of the late. Just Gaming~~ [ean-Francois Lyotard and Jean-Loup Thebaud Translated by Wlad Godzich Afterword by Samuel. Just Gaming Information Dynamics in Virtual Worlds: Gaming and Beyond. Woody Evans The Political Ethics of Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida.
|Published (Last):||20 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||10.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are many possible ways of linking on to a phrase, and no gaminng is the right way. He rejects the idea of a master-discourse later called a metanarrative that is thought to provide the basis for judgement in all situations. His prime concern llyotard that the structures that exploit libidinal intensities tend to become hegemonic. Discourse, Figure Lyotard’s second book of philosophy is long and difficult.
Lyotard makes three particularly important observations about language games. Different types of utterances, as identified by Wittgenstein, pertain to different types of language games.
Examples from particular movements in art and individual artists and writers are common in his philosophical works, and in addition he wrote a number of books on individual artists, including Georges Guiffrey, Albert Ayme, Gian-franco Baruchello, Jacques Monory, Valerio Adami, Shusaku Arakawa, and Daniel Buren. Lyotard’s response to the nihilism of representational theory is not to propose an “other” to it gamung he believes is impossiblebut to inscribe theory lyotwrd into the libidinal economy.
The libidinal philosophy engages with art on the level of its affective force: In the fifteen years between his first two lyitard of philosophy, Lyotard devoted all his writing efforts to the cause of revolutionary politics. Lyotard’s concept of postmodernism in the arts relates more to what is usually called modernism in the arts.
Lyotard introduces a distinction between opposition and difference to account for the differing ways in which the discursive and the figural function. Mike Tracy rated it liked it Jul 19, Instead, we want it to take us as far as it can, toward a point that might totally escape us, but toiling after it nonetheless because we conceive of it as a political and ethical good.
Lyotard rejects the claims of any discourse to be grounded in truth. Writings on Contemporary Art and Artists vol. Lyotard’s image of theory as theatre is based on the etymological relationship between the two terms; they are both derived from the Greek theasthaimeaning to look at, contemplate, or behold.
Lyotard does not propose that we champion affects, singularities, intensities and libidinal energy over systems, structures, theory, concepts and representation. However, we can “act passively” so as to encourage the maximum release of intensity within structures. Electronic Gaming and the Ethics of Information Ownership.
Jean-François Lyotard (1924—1998)
A rigid theory of how the body interacts with space, as Merleau-Ponty may arguably be accused of developing, also exhibits structuralist tendencies. The referent the wrong, etc.
In Lyotard’s philosophy of postmodernism and the differend, he develops an aesthetic theory of postmodern art. Gaming and the Limits of Digital Embodiment. Deniz rated it really liked it Apr 08, This is the libidinal band sometimes called the libidinal skin. But for the sake of justice, we must try.
Geoffrey Bennington jusst Rachel Bowlby Cambridge: This side of the tensor disrupts and escapes the system, flowing into new systems and structures. Art and Aesthetics Lyotard was a prolific writer on both art and philosophical aesthetics. In the case of a differend, the parties cannot agree on a rule or criterion by which their dispute might be decided.
One of juts sides or potentialities is the semiotic sign; this side is the potential to be inscribed in an existing structure of meaning. He suggests that structured, abstract conceptual thought has dominated philosophy since Plato, denigrating sensual experience.
A differend occurs when a discourse does not allow the linkages which would enable the presentation of a wrong.
On Lyotard and Thebaud’s “Just Gaming” | this cage is worms
Lyotard argues that legitimation by performativity is against the interests of research. Lyotard’s response to the nihilism of structure takes place through the concept of dissimulation, which suggests that libidinal energy must work within structures.
At the same time, they often deny libidinal intensities themselves, taking themselves to be primary and stable structures. Lytoard Lee rated it really liked it Nov 30, This theme the relation of phenomenology to Marxism was a prime concern for French thinkers of the fifties, and Lyotard’s book is a useful documentation of the issues at stake. Despite his radical disillusion with these early political commitments, however, a strong political concern remains a central feature of all of Lyotard’s mature works.
Lyotard interprets these two tendencies of capitalism in terms of the theory of dissimulation. Systems exploit libidinal intensities by channeling them into stable structures.
Just Gaming : Jean-Francois Lyotard :
On the other hand, capitalism tends to baming up libidinal energy into structured and regulated systems, restricting its flow.
Showing of 1 reviews. His aim is to show that structuralism ignores the figural elements at work both outside and within representational structures. Lyotard calls such claims into doubt through his thesis that events exceed representation. Lyotard sees the oyotard of capital, science and technology linked through legitimation by performativity as a similar threat, however.
Woody Evans – – Chandos. Alternatively, the victim may be able to speak, but that speech is unable to present the wrong done in the discourse of the rule of judgement.
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Iain Hamilton Grant London: